Shipman v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/23/10. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Report-Recommendation) (tab)

Download PDF
-DRH Shipman v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc. Doc. 6 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------DENNIS SHIPMAN, Plaintiff, v. STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: DENNIS SHIPMAN Plaintiff pro se 58 Grove Street, 2nd Floor Newburgh, New York 12250-4128 DAVID R. HOMER U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER Plaintiff pro se Dennis Shipman ("Shipman") commenced this action on September 20, 2010 under 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging violations of his civil rights. Dkt. No. 1. The complaint fails to satisfy the basic pleading requirements established by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, In an order filed September 24, 2010, this Court directed Shipman to file an amended complaint that fully complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and 10. Dkt. No. 4. Shipman has failed to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, since this action cannot proceed in the No. 1:10-CV-1124 (GLS/DRH) absence of Shipman's submission of a sufficient complaint, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that Shipman's complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f)(1)(C) and 37(b)(2)(A)(v) for Shipman's failure to comply with the Court's September 24, 2010 order; and it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk serve Shipman with a copy of this report-recommendation by regular mail and certified mail. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties may lodge written objections to the foregoing report. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court "within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the . . . recommendation." N.Y.N.D.L.R. 72.1(c) (citing 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C)). FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THIS REPORT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS WILL PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW. Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1993); Small v. Sec'y of HHS, 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(e). Dated: November 22, 2010 Albany, New York -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?