Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
DECISION & ORDER accepting in whole the 13 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hummel; that the Commissioner's decision denying pltf benefits is AFFIRMED; and the complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/25/2014. (see)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------RODESHIA JONES,
Plaintiff,
-v-
1:13-CV-1214
(DNH/CFH)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
OFFICE OF PETER M. MARGOLIUS
Attorney for Plaintiff
7 Howard Street
Catskill, NY 12414
PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ.
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Attorneys for Defendant
Social Security Administration
Region II
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
DAVID B. MYERS, ESQ.
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Rodeshia Jones filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of
the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits
under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated July 1, 2014, the
Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the
Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff benefits be affirmed. No objections to the ReportRecommendation were filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
ยง 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff benefits is AFFIRMED; and
2. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25. 2014
Utica, New York.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?