Murphy v. Gibbons et al
ORDER - That the 78 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety. That this action is dismissed due to Plaintiff's apparent abandonment, failure to prosecute, and failure to provide an updated address. See N.D.N.Y.L.R. 41.2(b)(dismissal of action appropriate where petitioner fails to notify Court of change of address). That the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/30/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
THOMAS GIBBONS, et al.
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
Plaintiff, Pro Se
229 Delaware Avenue
Albany, New York 12209
FOR THE DEFENDANTS:
Rehfuss, Liguori Law Firm
40 British American Blvd.
Latham, New York 12110
ABIGAIL W. REHFUSS, ESQ.
STEPHEN J. REHFUSS, ESQ.
Gary L. Sharpe
Senior District Judge
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following an ReportRecommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly
filed on January 6, 2017. (Dkt. No. 78.) Following fourteen days from the
service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections
filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No.
78) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that this action is dismissed due to Plaintiff’s apparent
abandonment, failure to prosecute, and failure to provide an updated
address. See N.D.N.Y.L.R. 41.2(b)(dismissal of action appropriate where
petitioner fails to notify Court of change of address); and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close the case; and it is
ORDERED that the clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties in
accordance with the court’s Local Rules of Practice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 30, 2017
Albany, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?