Ajamian v. Zakarian

Filing 31

JUDGMENT: in favor of Samuel Egish Zakarian against Robert H. Ajamian. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the # 18 Report-Recommendation towhich defendant objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in allrespects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint isDISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.] (mc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
ROBERT H. AJAMIAN
Plaintiff
v.

CASE NUMBER: 1:14-cv-321 (DNH/TWD)

SAMUEL EGISH ZAKARIAN
Defendant

Decision by Court. This action came to a hearing before the Court. The issues have
been heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the # [18] Report-Recommendation to
which defendant objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all
respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is ORDERED that Plaintif f’s complaint is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable District Judge David N. Hurd,
dated the 26 th day of August, 2014.

DATED: August 26, 2014

s/ Michelle Coppola
Deputy Clerk