Dillon v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER - That the 17 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. That the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Dillon's complaint, (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/18/2015. (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ MARTIN P. DILLON Plaintiff, 1:14-cv-1011 (GLS/DJS) v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Office of Peter M. Margolius 7 Howard Street Catskill, New York 12414 PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT: HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN United States Attorney 100 South Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13261 Steven P. Conte Regional Chief Counsel Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, Region II 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 Gary L. Sharpe District Judge JEREMY A. LINDEN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly filed on October 21, 2015. (Dkt. No. 17.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Dillon’s complaint, (Dkt. No. 1), is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the clerk of the court serve a copy of this order upon the parties in accordance with this court’s local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 18, 2015 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?