Dillon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER - That the 17 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. That the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Dillon's complaint, (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/18/2015. (jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________
MARTIN P. DILLON
Plaintiff,
1:14-cv-1011
(GLS/DJS)
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
________________________________
APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
Office of Peter M. Margolius
7 Howard Street
Catskill, New York 12414
PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ.
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN
United States Attorney
100 South Clinton Street
Syracuse, NY 13261
Steven P. Conte
Regional Chief Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel, Region II
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
Gary L. Sharpe
District Judge
JEREMY A. LINDEN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report
and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly filed on
October 21, 2015. (Dkt. No. 17.) Following fourteen days from the service
thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by
the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Report and Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17) is
ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and
Dillon’s complaint, (Dkt. No. 1), is DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED that the clerk of the court serve a copy of this order upon
the parties in accordance with this court’s local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 18, 2015
Albany, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?