Wilburn v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

DECISION and ORDER. The Report-Recommendation 12 of Magistrate Judge Dancks is adopted and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/28/2016. (lah)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------SARAH M. WILBURN, Plaintiff, -v- 1:15-CV-58 (DNH/TWD) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: Office of Peter M. Margolius Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 Howard Street Catskill, NY 12414 PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ. Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 BENIL ABRAHAM, ESQ. Special Asst. U.S. Attorney DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Sadie M. Wilburn filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security income benefits and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. By ReportRecommendation dated February 29, 2016, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2016 Utica, New York -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?