Wilburn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
DECISION and ORDER. The Report-Recommendation 12 of Magistrate Judge Dancks is adopted and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/28/2016. (lah)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------SARAH M. WILBURN,
Plaintiff,
-v-
1:15-CV-58
(DNH/TWD)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
Office of Peter M. Margolius
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 Howard Street
Catskill, NY 12414
PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ.
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant
Office of Regional General Counsel
Region II
26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
BENIL ABRAHAM, ESQ.
Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Sadie M. Wilburn filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of
the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security
income benefits and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. By ReportRecommendation dated February 29, 2016, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United
States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed
and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. No objections to the
Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Therefore,
it is ORDERED that
Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2016
Utica, New York
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?