Chet-5 Broadcasting, L.P. v. Birds of a Feather Media Limited

Filing 40

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Approving the # 38 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 9/22/2016. (nmk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHET-5 BROADCASTING, L.P., Plaintiff, vs. BIRDS OF A FEATHER MEDIA LIMITED, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-442 (FJS/CFH) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) and by agreement of the parties, the parties above hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action, including all claims, defenses and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. The parties further stipulate that no party to this action is an infant or incompetent person. Date: September 19, 2016 s/James R. Muldoon James R. Muldoon (Bar Roll No. 506772) HARRIS BEACH PLLC 333 W. Washington Street, Suite 200 Syracuse, New York 13202 Telephone: 315-423-7100 Email: jmuldoon@harrisbeach.com William H. Oldach III Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP 1909 K Street N.W., 9th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 467-8880 Email: wholdach@vorys.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Chet-5 Broadcasting, L.P. s/Ashley D. Hayes Ashley D. Hayes, Esq. Hancock & Estabrook, LLP 1500 AXA Tower I 100 Madison Street Syracuse, NY 13202 Telephone: 315-565-4500 Facsimile: 315-565-4600 Email: ahayes@hancocklaw.com Michael Cornman, Esq. Ladas & Parry LLC 1040 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10018 Telephone: 212-708-1800 Facsimile: 212-246-8959 Email: mcornman@ladas.com Attorneys for Defendant Birds of a Feather Media Limited SO ORDERED THIS __________ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. __________________________________ United States District Judge September 22, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?