Gulnick, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service
Filing
13
ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that this matter shall be REMANDED to the Surrogate's Court for Ulster County, New York. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 11/17/2016. (nmk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
BURTON GULNICK, JR., Public Administrator,
as the Administrator of the Estate of Richard C. Danko,
a/k/a Richard Danko,
Plaintiff,
v.
1:16-CV-1028
(FJS/CFH)
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendant.
ORDER
Whereas, on July 8, 2016, Petitioner Burton Gulnick, Jr., Public Administrator, as the
Administrator of the Estate of Richard C. Danko a/k/a Richard Danko (the “Estate”),
commenced the above-captioned matter by petition for judicial settlement of account (the
“Petition”) in the Surrogate’s Court for Ulster County, New York; and
Whereas, the Petition sought, among other things, to deny certain claims that the United
States Internal Revenue Service had filed against the Estate for unpaid income taxes (the “IRS
Claim”); and
Whereas, on August 19, 2016, the United States of America through the United States
Internal Revenue Service filed a Notice of Removal in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,
1441 and 1444; and
Whereas, by agreement in open court on November 14, 2016, the parties agreed to
resolve and settle the IRS Claim in full and to discontinue the Petition with prejudice against the
United States of America and the United States Internal Revenue Service; and
Whereas, the Estate has tendered the payment required under the parties’ agreement and,
as a result of the foregoing, the parties agree that this matter should be remanded to the
Surrogate’s Court for Ulster County, New York, the Court hereby
ORDERS that this matter shall be REMANDED to the Surrogate’s Court for Ulster
County, New York.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2016
Syracuse, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?