Woolsey v. Mitzel et al
DECISION AND ORDER adopting the 24 R & R. Therefore, Pltf's 12 amended complaint is dismissed as frivolous, with leave to replead only with respect to claims that do not directly relate to pltf's attempt to regain custody of her biologi cal daughter. Pltf may file a second amended complaint by 5/10/17. Failure to file a second amended complaint by 5/10/17 will result in judgment being entered for defts. Deft's 30 Motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/10/17. (Copy served via regular mail)(sfp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Civil Action No.
DESIREE ANN MITZEL and CHARLES
THOMAS J. McAVOY,
Senior United States District Judge
DECISION & ORDER
This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon.
David E. Peebles, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge
Peebles’ Report and Recommendation [dkt. # 24] have been filed, and the time to do so
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report and
Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [dkt. # 24] for the
reasons stated therein. Therefore, plaintiff's amended complaint [dkt. # 12] is DISMISSED
as frivolous, with leave to replead only with respect to claims that do not directly relate to
plaintiff's attempt to regain custody of her biological daughter.
If plaintiff elects to file a second amended complaint, she must do so within thirty (30)
days from the date of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff is advised that an amended
complaint supersedes in all respects the prior pleading. Therefore, if plaintiff files a
second amended complaint, she must properly allege in the second amended
complaint all factual bases for all claims asserted therein, and the second amended
complaint must be in compliance with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure as explained by Magistrate Judge Peebles. The failure to file a second
amended complaint within this time frame will be deemed an abandonment of any other
potential claims arising from this matter, and the Court Clerk’s Office will close this file and
enter judgment for defendants.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [dkt. # 30], is denied without prejudice as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?