Zurenda v. Cardiology Associates, P.C.

Filing 15

DECISION AND ORDER denying Deft's 10 Motion to Dismiss and granting Deft's 13 Motion to withdraw the motion. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/1/11. (sfp, )

Download PDF
-DEP Zurenda v. Cardiology Associates, P.C. Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JENNIFER A. ZURENDA, Plaintiff, v. CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendant. -------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY Sr. U.S. District Judge DECISION and ORDER Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 seeking to dismiss the action on the basis that it is untimely. Plaintiff filled an affidavit in opposition of the motion asserting that the action is timely. In response to Plaintiff's affidavit, Defendant filed an affidavit asserting that it "cannot maintain the motion in good faith at this time and asks the Court [to] deny [Defendant's motion to dismiss] without prejudice to refiling after discovery." Dkt. 13 at 2. Defendant asks the Court to do so because "it appears that Plaintiff's original Complaint was arguably timely." Without deciding the timeliness of Plaintiff's action, the Court grants Defendant's motion to withdraw its motion to dismiss. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment (Dkt. 10), is DENIED without prejudice and Defendant's motion to withdraw the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10-CV-0882 Dockets.Justia.com Dated:March 1, 2011 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?