Maki v. The Travelers Companies, Inc. et al
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 4 Report-Recommendation and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order for reasons stated therein. The 1 Complaint is DISMISSED and SUPERSEDED in all respects by the Amended Complaint. The Court offers opinion as to the legal viability of the claims put forth in the Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/19/2014. (dpk) [Sent copy of Order to Pro Se Plaintiff via U.S. Mail]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------FRANK MAKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 3:14-cv-08
(TJM/DEP)
THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES,
Defendant.
-------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY
Senior United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
This pro se action was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate
Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). In his Report,
Recommendation and Order (dkt. # 4), Magistrate Judge Peebles ordered that Plaintiff’s in forma
pauperis application (dkt. # 2) be granted and recommended, inter alia, that the Complaint (dkt. #
1) be dismissed with leave to amend.
Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report, Recommendation and Order but has filed an
Amended Complaint (dkt. # 6). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and
Order for the reasons stated therein. The Complaint (dkt. # 1) is DISMISSED and SUPERSEDED
in all respects by the Amended Complaint. The Court offers opinion as to the legal viability of the
claims put forth in the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:December 19, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?