Maki v. The Travelers Companies, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 Report-Recommendation and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order for reasons stated therein. The 1 Complaint is DISMISSED and SUPERSEDED in all respects by the Amended Complaint. The Court offers opinion as to the legal viability of the claims put forth in the Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/19/2014. (dpk) [Sent copy of Order to Pro Se Plaintiff via U.S. Mail]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------FRANK MAKI, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:14-cv-08 (TJM/DEP) THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, Defendant. -------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER This pro se action was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). In his Report, Recommendation and Order (dkt. # 4), Magistrate Judge Peebles ordered that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application (dkt. # 2) be granted and recommended, inter alia, that the Complaint (dkt. # 1) be dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report, Recommendation and Order but has filed an Amended Complaint (dkt. # 6). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. The Complaint (dkt. # 1) is DISMISSED and SUPERSEDED in all respects by the Amended Complaint. The Court offers opinion as to the legal viability of the claims put forth in the Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:December 19, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?