Brennan v. Broome County, New York et al

Filing 11

DECISION AND ORDER: that the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects and that Plaintiff's complaint is Dismissed as against defendant Behnke and that this matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Peebles for further proceedings. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 07/05/2017. (Copy of the Decision and Order was served via regular mail upon the pro se plaintiff on 7/5/2017.)(hmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------KEVIN JOSEPH GABRIEL BRENNAN, Plaintiff, -v- 3:17-cv-122 (DNH/DEP) BROOME COUNTY, NEW YORK and ROBERT BEHNKE, Broome County Attorney, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: KEVIN JOSEPH GABRIEL BRENNAN Plaintiff pro se 319 Exchange Avenue Townhouse #20 Endicott, New York 13760 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Kevin Joseph Gabriel Brennan brought this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. On May 2, 2017, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by ReportRecommendation that plaintiff's claims against defendant Behnke be dismissed, without leave to replead, and that plaintiff be permitted to proceed with his claims against defendant Broome County. Plaintiff timely filed an objection to the Report-Recommendation along with a proposed amended complaint, and an additional letter further explaining his objections. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as against defendant Behnke; and 2. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Peebles for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 5, 2017 Utica, New York. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?