Walker v. Village Court et al
DECISION AND ORDER: The # 8 Report-Recommendations of Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles is accepted in whole. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/20/2017. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail.](mc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------ALFRED MARION WALKER,
VILLAGE COURT; THE STATE OF NEW
YORK; VILLAGE OF ENDICOTT; ENDICOTT
POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DUNHAM,
Badge # 470; OFFICER J WANKA, Badge #
478; CAPTAIN COLLINS; JUDGE ALFONSO
ORTEGA; DAVID STOKES; KAREN MICALIZZI
TAUTERO; C.O. ZACHARY MOOR; SGT
BIXBY, C.O.; C.O. RICK BORCHARDT; C.O.
DENNIS ROWD; C.O. SEAN BELL; BROOME
COUNTY JAIL; and BROOME COUNTY,
ALFRED MARION WALKER
Plaintiff pro se
c/o 60 Saratoga Avenue
Binghamton, NY 13901
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Alfred Marion Walker brought this action against various state and
local agencies and employees. On August 4, 2017, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United
States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be
dismissed for failing to pay either a statutory filing fee or submit a properly supported
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, despite multiple opportunities to do so and
advisement of same. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
Therefore, it is
1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 20, 2017
Utica, New York.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?