Peterson v. Binghamton Police Department et al
ORDER - That the 4 order, Report, and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. That plaintiff's complaint is this action (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this order. That, if plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time permitted, the clerk is directed to close this case without further order of the court. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/5/2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
RONALD DONELL PETERSON,
BINGHAMTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
RONALD DONELL PETERSON
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Broome County Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 2047
Binghamton, New York 13902
Gary L. Sharpe
Senior District Judge
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following an Order,
Report, and Recommendation by Chief Magistrate Judge David E.
Peebles, duly filed on November 7, 2017. (Dkt. No. 4.) Following fourteen
days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and
all objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Order, Report, and Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Order, Report, and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4)
is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint in this action (Dkt. No. 1) is
DISMISSED with leave to replead within thirty days of the date of this
order; and it is further
ORDERED that, if plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within
the time permitted, the clerk is directed to close this case without further
order of the court; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties
in accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 5, 2017
Albany, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?