Wilder v. Brown et al
DECISION and ORDER: The Report-Recommendation, is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ORDERED that, Plaintiff's complaint is accepted for filing; and The City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police Department. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/30/2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PTL. KEVIN BROWN, Binghamton Police
Department; PTL. DANIEL OSTANEK,
Binghamton Police Department;
BINGHAMTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; and
Plaintiff, pro se
Attica Correctional Facility
Attica, NY 14011
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Titus Wilder brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. On May 10, 2018, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge,
advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be accepted for filing but that
the City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police Department. No
objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.
Based upon a careful review of the Report-Recommendation, the ReportRecommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
1. Plaintiff's complaint is accepted for filing; and
2. The City of Binghamton be substituted in place of the Binghamton Police
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 30, 2018
Utica, New York.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?