Kisacky v. O'Malley

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING the 13 Stipulation filed by Martin J. O'Malley: The Commissioner's final decision be reversed and that this action be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The parties agree that on remand, the Commissioner will offer the plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action as necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 9/24/2024. (sbb)

Download PDF
United States District Court Northern District of New York RANA KISACKY, Plaintiff, vs. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 3:24-cv-00493 Stipulation – Document Filed Electronically Parties’ Stipulation for Remand The parties stipulate that, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner’s final decision be reversed and that this action be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The parties agree that on remand, the Commissioner will offer the plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action as necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. The parties consent to the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respectfully Submitted, MARTIN O’MALLEY RANA KISACKY, By His Attorneys, By Her Attorney, Carla B. Freedman, United States Attorney Peter A. Gorton /s/ Shannon Fishel Shannon Fishel Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of Program Litigation, Office 2 Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235 (404) 562-1076 Shannon.Fishel@ssa.gov /s/ Peter A. Gorton Peter A. Gorton Attorney for Plaintiff 1500 East Main Street P.O. Box 89 Endicott, NY 13761-0089 (607) 754-0500 lgattorneys@stny.rr.com 9/24/2024

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?