Rescuecom Corporation v. Google, Inc.

Filing 4

FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Google, Inc.. (Regan, Shawn)

Download PDF
Rescuecom Corporation v. Google, Inc. Doc. 4 Case 5:04-cv-01055-NAM-GHL Document 4 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RESCUECOM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5:04-CV-1055 (NAM)(GHL) DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to enable Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the undersigned counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (named herein as "Google"), certifies that the following parties, parents, affiliates and/or subsidiaries are publicly held: Google Inc. Dated: New York, New York November 8, 2004 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:04-cv-01055-NAM-GHL Document 4 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 2 of 3 HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP By: /s/ Shawn Patrick Regan Shawn Patrick Regan, Esq. N.D.N.Y. Bar No. 510638 HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166-0136 Telephone: (212) 309-1000 Facsimile: (212) 309-1100 Attorneys for Google Inc. 64557.000001 NEW_YORK 193613v2 Case 5:04-cv-01055-NAM-GHL Document 4 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 3 of 3 DECLARATION OF SERVICE Raymond E. Galbraith, hereby declares under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that: I am a Litigation Paralegal at the firm of Hunton & Williams LLP, attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. That on November 8, 2004, I served a true copy of the foregoing on counsel for Plaintiff, via electronic service, at the address listed below I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 8, 2004. /s/ Raymond E. Galbraith Raymond E. Galbraith TO: Edmund J. Gegan, Esq. Rescuecom 2560 Burnet Avenue Syracuse, New York 13206 (315) 432-8800 Email: ed@rescuecom.com Counsel for Plaintiff Rescuecom Corporation 64557.000001 NEW_YORK 193618v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?