Small et al v. City of Syracuse et al

Filing 206

JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/3/12. (cbm )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ____________________________________ DAVID VIVENZIO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 5:05-CV-531 vs. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Defendant. ____________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF: AMDURSKY, PELKY LAW FIRM 26 East Oneida Street Oswego, NY 13126 TIMOTHY J. FENNELL, ESQ. FOR DEFENDANT: CITY OF SYRACUSE CORPORATION COUNSEL 233 East Washington Street Room 301 City Hall Syracuse, NY 13202 CATHERINE CARNRIKE, ESQ. HANCOCK, ESTABROOK LAW FIRM 1500 AXA Tower I 100 Madison Street Syracuse, NY 13221 JOHN POWERS, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BASED UPON SETTLEMENT The parties have entered into an agreement in settlement of all claims in this action, and that they reasonably anticipate finalizing their agreement shortly, following which this action will be discontinued, with prejudice, by stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Based upon this development, I find that it is not necessary for this action to remain on the court’s active docket. It is therefore hereby ORDERED, as follows: 1) This action is dismissed, with prejudice, except as set forth below. 2) The court will retain complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action within three months from the date of this order upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. 3) The Clerk shall forthwith serve copies of this judgment upon the parties and/or their attorneys appearing in this action by electronic means. 2 Dated: July 3, 2012 Utica, New York 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?