Alexander et al v. Cahill et al

Filing 47

NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL as to 40 Judgment, 39 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by James L. Alexander, Alexander & Catalano LLC, Public Citizen, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Beck, Gregory) Modified on 9/7/2007 (nas). PAID $455.00 - RECEIPT NO: SYR013064

Download PDF
Alexander et al v. Cahill et al Doc. 47 Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL Document 47 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES L. ALEXANDER; ALEXANDER & ) CATALANO LLC; and PUBLIC CITIZEN, ) ) INC., ) ) Civil Action No. 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) THOMAS J. CAHILL; DIANA MAXFIELD ) ) KEARSE; GARY L. CASELLA; RITA E. ) ADLER; MARK S. OCHS; ANTHONY J. ) GIGLIOTTI; DANIEL A. DRAKE; and ) VINCENT L. SCARSELLA, ) ) Defendants. _____________________________________ ) PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL Notice is hereby given that all plaintiffs in the above-captioned case appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from those portions of the memorandum decision, order, and final judgment entered in this case on July 23, 2007 (Docs. 39 & 40), that denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gregory A. Beck Gregory A. Beck N.D.N.Y. Bar Roll No. 514293 (pro hac vice) Brian Wolfman N.D.N.Y. Bar Roll No. 514292 (pro hac vice) Scott L. Nelson N.D.N.Y. Bar Roll No. 513515 PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP 1600 20th St., NW Washington, DC 20009 Phone: (202) 588-1000 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL Document 47 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 2 Fax: (202) 588-7795 Email: gbeck@citizen.org brian@citizen.org snelson@citizen.org Counsel for Plaintiffs Dated: August 29, 2007 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?