Scaccia v. County of Onondaga, New York et al
Filing
34
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: approving the # 33 Stipulation of Discontinuance, the only pending claim in this action - plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Johnson in his individual capacity is discontinued with prejudice, and without costs or attorney's fees to either party as against the other. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/16/2011. (jmb)
U.S. DISTRICT COURT -N.D OF NY,
FILED
SEP 1 6 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Civil Action No.
RONALD A. SCACCIA,
Plaintiff.
AT
O'CLOCK
5:07-CV-0207, (3
, Oerk - Syracuse
v.
STIPULATION OF
DISCONTINUANCE
COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK;
TIMOTHY H. COWIN; KEVIN E. WALSH; and
MARK JOHNSTON, M.D.,
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the
attorneys of record for all the parties to the above-entitled action, that whereas no party
hereto is an infant or incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed and no
person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, the only pending claim
in the above-entitled action - that is. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant
Johnston in his individual capacity - be, and the same hereby is discontinued, with prejudice,
and without costs or attorney's fees to either party as against the other.
This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court.
Dated: August XL? , 2011
THE HON. GORDON J. CUFFY
Onondaga County Attorney
Dated: August
,2011
SCACCIA LAW FIRM
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant Johnston
Carol L. Rhinehart, Esq.
Deputy County Attorney
Dante M. Scaccia, Esq.
Bar Roll No. 505749
Bar Roll No. 509096
County of Onondaga Department of Law
421 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor
Syracuse, New York 13202
<3iflS3SOORDER
T. Suddaby
U.S. District Judge
Dated:
^ ^
State Tower Building
109 South Warren Street, Suite 402
13202
Syracuse, New York
{315)422-4000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?