Raffe et al v. American National Red Cross et al
Filing
86
JUDGMENT: in favor of defendants' American National Red Cross, American Red Cross of Tompkins County and Jennifer Yarbrough against Michael J. Raffe. (jmb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Michael J. Raffe and Lauren Signer, husband and wife
Plaintiffs
vs.
CASE NUMBER: 5:08-CR-211 (NPM/GHL)
American National Red Cross; American Red Cross of Tompkins County; and
Jennifer Yarbrough, Executive Director of American Red Cross of Tompkins County
Defendants
Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court.
The issues have been heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
That defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the following
claims: plaintiff’s claim of age discrimination under New York Human Rights Law section
296, plaintiff’s claims for “benefits or wage supplements” under New York Labor Law
section 198-c and plaintiff’s claim for overtime pay under the Federal Labor Standards
Act. Plaintiff’s claims under New York Human Rights Law section 296, New York Labor
Law section 198-c and the Federal Labor Standards are DISMISSED. Plaintiff Lauren
Signer was terminated on 11/30/2011.
Further is is ordered that the Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 59(e) is GRANTED, therefore the Memorandum-Decision & Order dated
11/30/2011 is amended to reflect that defendants’ motion for Summary Judgment
regarding plaintiff’s claims against them pursuant to New York Labor Law sections 191
and 195 is GRANTED, disposing of this action in its entirety. Judgment is entered in
favor of the defendants’ and this action is closed.
All of the above pursuant to the orders of the Honorable Judge Neal P. McCurn, dated
11/30/2011 and 1/17/12.
DATED: January 18, 2012
s/
Joanne Bleskoski
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?