Sutton v. City of Syracuse Police Department et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; and the City of Syracuse and Stephen Bear shall be the only parties named in the caption for this action.Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/9/2009. (see)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------TIFFANY SUTTON Plaintiff, -vCITY OF SYRACUSE; STEPHEN BEAR, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. -------------------------------5:08-CV-410-DNH-GHL
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge
ORDER Pursuant to the oral decision of the Court, entered into the record after hearing oral argument on July 9, 2009, in Utica, New York, it is hereby ORDERED that (1) defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the following claims and these claims are DISMISSED: (a) plaintiff's claims for false arrest and unreasonable search and seizure to the extent those claims assert violations of plaintiff's rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; (b) plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress to the extent that claim is asserted against the City of Syracuse; (2) defendant's motion for summary judgment as to all other claims is DENIED; and
(3) The City of Syracuse and Stephen Bear shall be the only parties named in the caption for this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2009 Utica, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?