Lee v. United States of America

Filing 16

DECISION & ORDER: accepting and adopting in all respects Magistrate Judge Lowe's 15 Report and Recommendation; denying 1 Motion for Return of Property; and that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file in this matter. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/24/2010. (see)

Download PDF
Lee v. United States of America Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------GREGORY B. LEE, JR., Petitioner, - vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. -----------------------------------APPEARANCES: GREGORY B. LEE, JR. 13817-052 Petitioner, Pro Se Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels East: PO Box 2000 Fort Dix, NJ 08640 HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York 445 Broadway 218 James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse Albany, NY 12207 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Gregory B. Lee, Jr., the named petitioner, brought this action in December 2009, for the return of certain property. By Report-Recommendation dated August 13, 2010, the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that petitioner's motion for return of property be denied; and further recommended that the Clerk of the Court close the file in this matter. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. THOMAS A. CAPEZZA, ESQ. Assistant U.S. Attorney OF COUNSEL: 5:09-CV-1421 Dockets.Justia.com Based upon a careful review of the entire file, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Lowe, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1. Petitioner's motion for return of property is DENIED; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 24 , 2010 Utica, New York. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?