Roehm v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER: It is ordered that the # 12 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter is ADOPTED in its entirety, the Commissioner's determination is AFFIRMED and the Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order upon all parties and Magistrate Judge Baxter. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 12/15/2011. (jmb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
DONNA ROEHM,
Plaintiff,
v.
5:11-CV-161
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
N
Defendant.
________________________________________________
OF COUNSEL:
Office of Steven R. Dolson
500 South Salina Street, 6th Fl.
P.O. Box 1279
Syracuse, NY 13201-1279
Counsel for Plaintiff
A
APPEARANCES:
Steven R. Dolson, Esq.
Office of Regional General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Region II
26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
Counsel for Defendant
Christopher J. Brackett, Esq.
NORMAN A. MORDUE, CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
M
The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge
Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed on the 28th day of November 2011. Following fourteen (14) days
from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by
the parties herein.
After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.
2. Commissioner’s determination is affirmed, and the complaint is dismissed in its
entirety.
3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the
Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.
N
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2011
Syracuse, New York
A
M
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?