Roehm v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER: It is ordered that the # 12 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter is ADOPTED in its entirety, the Commissioner's determination is AFFIRMED and the Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order upon all parties and Magistrate Judge Baxter. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 12/15/2011. (jmb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________ DONNA ROEHM, Plaintiff, v. 5:11-CV-161 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, N Defendant. ________________________________________________ OF COUNSEL: Office of Steven R. Dolson 500 South Salina Street, 6th Fl. P.O. Box 1279 Syracuse, NY 13201-1279 Counsel for Plaintiff A APPEARANCES: Steven R. Dolson, Esq. Office of Regional General Counsel Social Security Administration Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 Counsel for Defendant Christopher J. Brackett, Esq. NORMAN A. MORDUE, CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER M The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed on the 28th day of November 2011. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety. 2. Commissioner’s determination is affirmed, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case. N IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 15, 2011 Syracuse, New York A M 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?