Hines v. Central New York Regional Transportation Authority et al

Filing 8

ORDER: ORDERED, that the 4 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed August 1, 2011 is ACCEPTED in its entirety; ORDERED, that this action be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I)-(iii). Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation and Order) (mgh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------THEO HINES, SR. pro se, on behalf of
himself, et al.,
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
5:11-cv-835 (GLS/ATB)
CENTRAL NEW YORK REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:

OF COUNSEL:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
THEO HINES, SR.
Plaintiff, Pro Se
1000 Cannon Street
Syracuse, New York 13205
FOR THE DEFENDANTS:
No Appearances Made

GARY L. SHARPE,
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed August
1, 2011. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the

file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed1, and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Andrew T. Baxter filed August 1, 2011 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the
reasons state therein, and it is further
ORDERED, that this action be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY sua
sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I)-(iii); and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of
this order upon the parties in accordance by regular and certified mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated:

October 20, 2011
Albany, New York

1

The court notes that the plaintiff has sought two extensions, which were granted by the
court, to file objections to the pending Report-Recommendation but has failed to file any objections
in the time frame permitted.
2