Humphrey v. Court Clerk for the US Supreme Court

Filing 10

BAR ORDER: Plaintiff John Jay Humphrey is hereby barred from filing any future pro se actions in this court without prior leave of the Court, pursuant to 28 USC section 1961(a) and the Court's inherent authority to manage its docket so as to prevent abuse in its proceedings. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/10/2012. {Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
____________________________________________
JOHN JAY HUMPHREY,
Plaintiff,
5:11-CV-0938
(GTS/ATB)

v.
COURT CLERK FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT,
Defendant.
____________________________________________
APPEARANCES:
JOHN JAY HUMPHREY
Plaintiff, Pro Se
1030 Danforth Street, Apt. 3
Syracuse, New York 13208
HON. GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States District Judge
BAR ORDER

On January 30, 2012, in this pro se civil rights action filed by John Jay Humphrey
("Plaintiff"), the Court issued a Decision and Order that, inter alia, directed Plaintiff to show cause,
within thirty (30) days, as to why the Court should not issue an Order barring Plaintiff from filing
any future pro se actions in this Court without prior leave of the Court. (Dkt. No. 7.) On February
3, 2012, Plaintiff filed a response to that order. (Dkt. No. 9.) Even when construed with the utmost
of special liberality, Plaintiff’s response fails to show the cause required by the Court’s order.
(Compare Dkt. No. 7 with Dkt. No. 9.) As a result, for the reasons stated in the Court’s Decision
and Order of January 30, 2012, Plaintiff is hereby barred from filing any future pro se actions in this
Court without prior leave of the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) and the Court's inherent
authority to manage its docket so as to prevent abuse in its proceedings. (Dkt. No. 9.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2012
Syracuse, New York