Brodzki v. Shannon et al

Filing 6

JUDGMENT: in favor of Tarrant County, Joe Shannon, Jr against Anthony Brodzki. {Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
ANTHONY BRODZKI
Plaintiff
vs.

CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1117 (GTS/ATB)

JOE SHANNON, JR., District Attorney of Tarrant County, Texas; and TARRANT
COUNTY
Defendant(s)
ANTHONY BRODZKI
Plaintiff
vs.

CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1118 (GTS/ATB)

PHIL KOSS, District Attorney of Walworth County, Wisconsin; and DAVE
ROGERS, District Attorney of Clark County, Nevada
Defendant(s)
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
That the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED
with prejudice pursuant to 28 USC section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii). The Court certifies, for
the purposes of 28 USC section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal of the Decision & Order in
this matter would not be taken in good faith.
All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Judge Glenn T. Suddaby, dated
the 27th day of January, 2012.

DATED: January 30, 2012

s/
Joanne Bleskoski
Deputy Clerk