Yassin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Commissioners Decision denying disability benefits is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 27, 2014. (sas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMJAD YASSIN, Plaintiff, -against- 5:12-CV-1712 (LEK/CFH) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ___________________________________ ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on January 29, 2014, by the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(d). Dkt. No. 13 (“Report-Recommendation”). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge’s reportrecommendation, the party “may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); L.R. 72.1(c). “If no objections are filed . . . reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear error.” Edwards v. Fischer, 414 F. Supp. 2d 342, 346-47 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); see also Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003) (“As a rule, a party’s failure to object to any purported error or omission in a magistrate judge’s report waives further judicial review of the point.”); Farid v. Bouey, 554 F. Supp. 2d 301, 306 (N.D.N.Y. 2008). No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed in the allotted time period. After a thorough review of the Report-Recommendation and the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for clear error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Commissioner’s Decision denying disability benefits is AFFIRMED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order upon the parties to this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 27, 2014 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?