Phillips v. New York State et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting and accepting in all respects the 3 Order and Report-Recommendation of the Honorable Therese Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, dated 9/30/2013; and it is further ORDERED that 1. plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice; 2. the Clerk is directed to file a Judgment accordingly; and 3. the Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/17/2013. (copy of this Order served on pro se party via regular mail and certified mail, return receipt requested). (sg )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------WILLIAM PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, -v- No. 5:13-CV-927 NEW YORK STATE; and DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: WILLIAM PHILLIPS Plaintiff pro se 11 Greenbush Street Cortland, NY 13045 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2013, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by ReportRecommendation, sua sponte dismissal of the complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice; 2. The Clerk is directed to file a judgment accordingly; and 3. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 17, 2013 Utica, New York. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?