Pietrafesa v. Dwyer et al
Filing
22
ORDER - That the 21 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks filed November 17, 2014 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/9/2014. (jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------RICHARD C. PIETRAFESA, JR.
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
5:13-cv-1565 (GLS/TWD)
KIM A. DWYER et al.
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
Office of Anthony J. Pietrafesa
210 Bell Court
Schenectady, New York 12303
FOR THE DEFENDANT KIM
DWYER:
KIM A. DWYER
Pro Se
5196 South Shore Drive
Clear Lake, Iowa 50428
FOR DEFENDANT U.S. TURBINE
AIRCRAFT SALES, INC.:
No Appearance Made.
GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE
ANTHONY J. PIETRAFESA, ESQ.
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed
November 17, 2014. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the
Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties
herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Therese Wiley Dancks filed November 17, 2014 (Dkt. No. 21) is ACCEPTED
in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure
to prosecute; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this
Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 9, 2014
Albany, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?