Heath v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER - That the 17 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed April 10, 2015 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and the plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 4/29/2015. (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------MONICA HEATH Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-223 (GLS/ATB) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Legal Services of Central New York 472 South Salina Street Suite 300 Syracuse, New York 13202 CHRISTOPHER CADIN, ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT: Social Security Administration Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE TOMASINA DIGRIGOLI, ESQ. ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed April 10, 2015. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed April 10, 2015 (Dkt. No. 17) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2015 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?