Heath v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER - That the 17 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed April 10, 2015 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and the plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 4/29/2015. (jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------MONICA HEATH
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
5:14-cv-223 (GLS/ATB)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security
Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
Legal Services of Central New York
472 South Salina Street
Suite 300
Syracuse, New York 13202
CHRISTOPHER CADIN, ESQ.
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
Social Security Administration
Office of Regional General Counsel
Region II
26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904
New York, New York 10278
GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE
TOMASINA DIGRIGOLI, ESQ.
ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed April 10,
2015. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent
the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Andrew T. Baxter filed April 10, 2015 (Dkt. No. 17) is ACCEPTED in its
entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the
plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this
Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 29, 2015
Albany, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?