Sanchez v. Bonacchi

Filing 17

ORDER - That the 6 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter filed April 23, 2014 is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That plaintiff's 2 Motion ofr an Order to Show Cause and TRO/Preliminary Injunction (Dkt No. 2) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/27/2014. (jel, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------GERMAN SANCHEZ
Plaintiff,
-v.Civil Action No.
5:14-cv-452 (GLS/ATB)
ALDO BONACCHI, Sgt. Shield #6039,
Oswego Police Department
Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES:

OF COUNSEL:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
GERMAN SANCHEZ
Pro Se
13-B-2112
Gowanda Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 311
Gowanda, New York
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
Bond, Schoeneck Law Firm
130 East Second Street
Oswego, New York 13126

DOUGLAS M. MCRAE, ESQ.

GARY L. SHARPE,
CHIEF JUDGE

ORDER
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed April 23,

2014. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent
the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed 1, and the court having reviewed the
Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Andrew T. Baxter filed April 23, 2014 (Dkt. No. 6) is ACCEPTED in its
entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an Order to Show Cause and
TRO/Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties in
accordance to the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 27, 2014
Albany, New York

1

On May 12, 2014, the plaintiff filed a letter seeking an extension to obtain legal assistance from
several of the legal aid offices or the appointment of counsel. (Dkt. No. 11) . On May 20, 2014, the court
issued an Order denying plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel at this juncture. Furthermore, the
court granted the plaintiff an extension of time until June 20, 2014 to file any objections to the Report and
Recommendation. Despite the passage of the due date, the plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report
and Recommendation.

2