King v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

DECISION and ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations. Based upon careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. Therefore it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/15/2015. (dpk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------ADDIE MAE KING, Plaintiff, -v- 5:14-CV-978 (DNH/CFH) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: ADDIE MAE KING Plaintiff Pro Se 2005 E. Fayette Street #102 Syracuse, NY 13224 OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL Attorneys for Defendant Social Security Administration Region II 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 JOSHUA L. KERSHNER, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Addie Mae King filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated December 11, 2014, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Commissioner's unopposed motion to dismiss the complaint based on plaintiff's failure to timely commence this action within the sixty-day time period prescribed by law be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. The Commissioner's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?