Welch Allyn, Inc. v. OBP Corporation et al

Filing 110

DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's objections to the Amended Report-Recommendation, Dkt. # 98 , are hereby Overruled. Defendants' objections to the Amended Report-Recommendation, Dkt. # 97 , are hereby Overruled, and the Amended Report-Recommendation, Dkt. # 90 , is hereby adopted. Accordingly, the following constructions of the claim terms are hereby adopted: Agreed-Upon Terms. {See Chart on pages 2, 3 and 4}. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 06/16/2016. (hmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WELCH ALLYN, INC., Plaintiff, v. 5:14-cv-1122 (TJM/DEP) OBP CORPORATION and OBP MEDICAL, INC., Defendants. Thomas J. McAvoy, D.J. DECISION and ORDER The Court referred this patent infringement action to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants infringed its United States Patent No. 8,435,175, entitled “Vag inal Speculum Apparatus.” Presently at issue is how the claims in that patent should be construed. The Report-Recommendation, dated March 31, 2016, addressed the parties claimconstruction arguments. Magistrate Judge Peebles recommended that the Court adopt the claim-construction language that was undisputed by the parties and further recommended specific language for those claims the parties disputed. Both sides filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. When objections 1 to a magistrate judge’s Report-Recommendation are lodged, the Court makes a “de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After such a review, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. Having reviewed the record de novo and having considered the issues raised in the Plaintiff’s objections, this Court has determined to accept and adopt the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Peebles for the reasons stated in the Report-Recommendation. Accordingly: Plaintiff’s objections to the Amended Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 98, are hereby OVERRULED. Defendants’ objections to the Amended Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 97, are hereby OVERRULED, and the Amended Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 90, is hereby adopted. Accordingly, the following constructions of the claim terms are hereby adopted: 1. Agreed-Upon Terms: Term/Phrase Agreed Construction integral curved light pipe a component of the portable illumination assembly that transmits light receives the handle portion itself (not some other component) holds or contains a portion of the portable illumination assembly set of rails a pair of substantially straight structures (for example, a track) on the handle portion of the portable illumination assembly 2 housing an enclosure that retains the portable power supply within a common housing an enclosure that retains within it the components of the portable illumination assembly 2. Claims in dispute Term Construction portable illumination assembly a self-contained illumination assembly that can be easily moved from place-to-place switch a lever, plug, or other device for making or breaking contact, or altering the connections of a circuit mechanism for energizing a slider switch with a conductive strip; a rotary switch with conductive strip; an optical switch; a magnetic/reed switch; an ON/OFF throw switch that can be enabled with the speculum when engaged therewith to automatically or manually energize and de-energize the LED; and equivalents of the foregoing switches said speculum is disposable the speculum is designed to be discarded after a single use or a single patient use the entire apparatus is disposable the entire apparatus is designed to be discarded after a single use or a single patient use said illumination assembly is accessed . . . through said opening the portable illumination assembly can be energized and/or removed through the opening can be accessed . . . only through said defined opening the portable illumination assembly is designed to be energized only by accessing the energization mechanism through the opening formed by the yoke and lever portion releasably attached capable of being easily detached 3 lower Blade no construction necessary handle Portion no construction necessary proximal End no construction necessary IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: June 16, 2016 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?