Allen v. Colvin
Filing
18
DECISION AND ORDER adopting re 17 Report and Recommendations. Based upon careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/14/2016. (khr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------TAMARA L. ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
-v-
5:14-CV-1576
(DNH/ATB)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Defendant.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
Olinsky Law Group
Attorneys for Plaintiff
300 S. State Street
Suite 420
Syracuse, NY 13202
HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ.
NATHANIEL V. RILEY, ESQ.
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant
Office of Regional General Counsel
Region II
26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
SERGEI ADEN , ESQ.
Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Tamara L. Allen filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of
the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security
income benefits and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. By ReportRecommendation dated February 22, 2016, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States
Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that
plaintiff's complaint be dismissed. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been
filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C.
ยง 636(b)(1).
Therefore,
it is ORDERED that
Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 14, 2016
Utica, New York
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?