Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 95

ORDER that the stay on the Consent Order to Remand, (Dkt. No. 83 , at 2), is lifted and that this matter is remanded to the Agency for further proceedings inaccordance with the Consent Order to Remand, (Dkt. No. 83 ). The Agency, on remand: shall update its records to reflect the change of custody; shall direct all future communications to F.B.'s sole legal custodian, Walter Newman, or to any representative he duly appoints; and shall cease communicating with Rochelle Coleman a/k/a Rochelle Brooks with respect to any and all claims relating to F.B.. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 5/19/2020. (rjb, )

Download PDF
Case 5:15-cv-00148-BKS-CFH Document 95 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK F.B., Plaintiff, 5:15-cv-00148 (BKS/CFH) v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge: ORDER The parties have advised the Court that the custody matter involving F.B. has been resolved, and that Walter Newman, the father of F.B. has been “granted ‘sole legal and physical custody of [F.B.],’” and that F.B. will remain with her father in Oklahoma. (Dkt. No. 94, at 1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the stay on the Consent Order to Remand, (Dkt. No. 83, at 2), is lifted; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Agency for further proceedings in accordance with the Consent Order to Remand, (Dkt. No. 83); and it is further ORDERED that the Agency, on remand: shall update its records to reflect the change of custody; shall direct all future communications to F.B.’s sole legal custodian, Walter Newman, or to any representative he duly appoints; and shall cease communicating with Rochelle Coleman a/k/a Rochelle Brooks with respect to any and all claims relating to F.B. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2020 Syracuse, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?