New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund v. Dry Ice Corp. et al
Filing
28
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER: Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 12/23/2015. (nmk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE
PENSION & RETIREMENT FUND, by its Trustees,
John Bulgaro, Daniel W. Schmidt, Michael Scalzo, Sr.,
Tom J. Ventura, Bob Schaeffer, Brian Hammond,
Mark May and Paul Markwitz,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No.: 5:15-cv-320
(FJS-ATB)
DRY ICE CORP., AMERICAN COMPRESSED
GASES, INC., TRUCAR LEASING CORP.,
GOLDFINCH REAL ESTATE CORP., WHITE OAK
REAL ESTATE CORP., ORIOLE REAL ESTATE
CORP., HICKORY HILLS CARDINAL REAL ESTATE,
AND ANY AND ALL UNNAMED MEMBERS
OF THEIR CONTROLLED GROUP,
Defendants.
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER
The Plaintiffs, New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund and its
Board of Trustees (collectively, the "Pension Fund"), filed a Complaint in this matter against the
Defendant, Dry Ice Corporation ("Dry Ice"), on March 9, 2015. An Amended Complaint was filed
by the Pension Fund against Dry Ice and others on September 14,2015.
The Pension Fund and Dry
Ice now make the following offer of proof with Dry Ice hereby consenting to the entry of a Judgment
and Order against it by this Court in accordance therewith.
A.
Dry Ice admits that this Court has jurisdiction over it and over the subject matter of
this action; that this Court has the authority to enter this Order; and that this Court is the proper
venue for any enforcement of the within Order.
B.
Dry Ice further admits and concedes that:
ACTIVE 32742060vl
12117/2015
1
1.
It was party to a collective bargaining agreement which, by its terms, required
it to make contributions to the Pension Fund on behalf of certain of its employees and was also
signatory to a participation agreement with the Pension Fund which further required it to make
contributions to the Pension Fund on behalf of certain of its employees.
2.
As such party, Dry Ice had "an obligation to contribute" to the Pension Fund
as that term is defined in 29 D.S.C. §1392(a).
3.
On or about April 1,2013, Dry Ice permanently ceased all covered operations
under the Pension Fund Plan andlor permanently ceased to have an obligation to contribute to the
Pension Fund Plan on behalf of certain of its employees. Consequently, as Plan sponsor, the Pension
Fund determined that Dry Ice had thereby affected a "complete withdrawal"
from the Plan as
defined in 29 U.S.C. §1383 and triggered a withdrawal liability in the sum of $4,083,653.88.
4.
By letter dated July 10, 2013, the Pension Fund notified Dry Ice and all
members of its controlled group that they owe an employer withdrawal liability in the sum of
$4,083,653.88, provided a schedule of interim payments and demanded payment in a lump sum or in
accordance with said payment schedule.
5.
Said July 10,2013 'Notice and Demand for Payment of Employer Withdrawal
Liability' letter was received by Dry Ice at its address 39 McClellan Street, Newark, N.J. 07114.
6.
American Compressed Gases, Inc. ("ACG") and the remaining non-Dry Ice
Defendants assert that the July 10, 2013 correspondence did not provide notice of any withdrawal
liability on the behalf of the non-Dry Ice Defendants, because in part these companies had separated
from Dry Ice in 2012. The Pension Fund disputes these assertions.
7.
On or about September 9, 2013, Dry Ice began making interim monthly
payments of the assessed withdrawal liability in accordance with the plan sponsor's aforementioned
schedule.
ACTIVE 32742060vl
12/17/2015
2
8.
On October 7,2013, Dry Ice made a request for review pursuant to 29 D.S.C.
§1399(b )(2)(A)(i) of ERISA.
9.
On November 11, 2013, the Pension Fund sent Dry Ice and its Controlled
Group members a notice of revised withdrawal liability that increased the withdrawal liability to
$4,161,876.14 and correspondingly increased the amount of the interim monthly payments.
10.
ACG and the remaining non-Dry Ice Defendants assert that the November 11,
2013 correspondence did not provide notice of any revised withdrawal liability on the behalf of the
non-Dry Ice Defendants, because in part these companies had separated from Dry Ice in 2012. The
Pension Fund disputes these assertions.
11.
On November 12, 2013, the Pension Fund responded to Dry Ice's request for
review pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1399(b)(2)(B).
12.
On or about April 15,2014, Dry Ice made written request to the Pension Fund
to modify or suspend the interim payments it was making on the basis of financial hardship and
provided financial information to the Pension Fund in support of that request.
13.
Before the Pension Fund could act on Dry Ice's request to modify or suspend
interim payments, on or about May 8, 2014, Dry Ice unilaterally ceased making monthly interim
payments to the Pension Fund.
14.
At a Board of Trustees'
meeting on May 23, 2014, the Pension Fund
considered and denied Dry Ice's request for a modification and/or suspension of its interim payments
and instead rightfully declared a "default" under Section 6, E, 2(b) and (e) of the Pension Fund's
Policies
and
Procedures
For
Contributing
Employers
("Policies")
and
under
29
D.S.C.
§1399( c)(5)(B) ("Default").
15.
Said declared Default was based on the financial information
Dry Ice
provided to the Pension Fund which included, among other things, details of a 2012 transaction that
allegedly "separated" Dry Ice from its controlled group members, along with information that led the
ACTIVE 32742060vl
12117/2015
3
Pension Fund to determine that Dry Ice was unable to pay its debts as they became due and its
creditworthiness was materially impaired.
16.
By letter dated June 2, 2014, the Pension Fund formally notified Dry Ice of
the Default and demanded full payment of the outstanding withdrawal liability in the amount of
$2,713,194.33.
17.
To date, Dry Ice has not paid said outstanding balance of the withdrawal
liability or any portion thereof. Nor has any such payment been made to the Pension Fund by any
person, company or entity on Dry Ice's behalf.
18.
By reason of Dry Ice's default, the withdrawal liability became accelerated
and due and owing to the Pension Fund in the sum of $2,713,194.33, together with interest, an
additional award of the greater of interest or liquidated damages, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees
as provided in 29 U.S.C. §§1399(c)(2), (c)(5), 1132(g)(2), 1401(b)(1) and 1451(b).
19.
To date, Dry Ice has never demanded arbitration to contest any determination
of the Pension Fund relates to the assessed employer withdrawal liability as prescribed under 29
D.S.C. §1401(a)(l).
20.
Said failure to timely demand arbitration accelerates the subject withdrawal
liability and renders same due and owing to the Pension Fund in the sum of $2,713,194.33 together
with interest, an additional award of the greater of interest or liquidated damages, costs and
reasonable attorneys' fees as provided in 29 U.S.C. §§1399(c)(2), (c)(5), 1132(g)(2), 1401(a)(1) and
(b)(1) and 1451 (b).
C.
By reason of the foregoing, Dry Ice consents to the entry of this Judgment and Order
by this Court as set forth below; waives any and all claims of any nature whatsoever that it has or
may have against the Pension Fund or any of its trustees, administrators,
managers,
agents,
employees, representatives or attorneys arising out of or in connection with this action; and waives
its right to any appeal from this Consent Judgment and Order.
ACTIVE 32742060vl
12117/2015
4
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Order and the subject matter of this
action.
2. The Pension Fund shall hereby be granted a Judgment against Dry Ice for the unpaid
employer
withdrawal
liability
in accordance
with 29 U.S.C.
§§1132(g)(2)(A),
1399(e)(2) and (5)(B) and 1451(b) in the amount of $2,713,194.33; for interest in
accordance with 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(B)
in the amount of $403,928.98; for an
additional award of interest in accordance with 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(C)
amount of $403,928.98; and for
U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D)
amount of$3,579,818.49
in the
costs and attorneys' fees in accordance with 29
in the amount of $58,766.40 for a total judgment
in the
($2,713,194.13 + $403,928.98 + $403,928.98 +$58,766.40).
3. Dry Ice shall not be entitled to any costs, attorneys' fees or any other relief from the
Plaintiffs herein.
4. Dry Ice shall and does hereby waive any and all claims of any nature whatsoever that
it has or may have against the Pension Fund or any of its trustees, administrators,
managers,
agents, employees,
representatives
or attorneys
arising out of or in
connection with this action.
5. Dry Ice shall and does hereby waive its right to any appeal from this Consent
Judgment and Order.
6. This Order shall not in any way prejudice the Pension Fund with respect to any of its
claims against any of the other named or unnamed defendants in this action.
7. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for purpose of enforcing compliance
with the terms of this Consent Judgment and Order.
ACTIVE 32742060vl
12/17/2015
5
The Pension Fund moves for entry of
the Judgment
Dry Ice's consent to entry of
the Judgment
Paravati, Karl, Green & DeBella, LLP
Fox Rothschild, LLP
Isl Vincent M. DeBella
Isl James Lemonedes
Vincent M. DeBella, Esq. (101465)
12 Steuben Park
Utica, New York 13501
p. (315)735-6481
f. (315)735-6406
E-mail: vdebella@pkgdlaw.com
James Lemonedes, Esq. (519451)
100 Park Avenue, is" Floor
New York, New York 10017
p. (212)878-7918
f. (212)692-0940
E-mail: jlemonedes@ioxrothschild.com
SO ORDERED
Dated: December _,
2015
Hon. Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
Senior U.S. District Court Judge
December 23, 2015
ACTIVE 32742060v1 12117/2015
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?