UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Spaulding
Filing
13
DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 10) for default judgment is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as follows: $5,595.28 in unpaid principal and $6,719.62 in accrued interest, for a total award of $12,314.90; plus post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 10, 2016. (sas)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
5:15-CV-0482 (LEK/DEP)
JOHN A. SPAULDING,
Defendant.
DECISION and ORDER
I.
INTRODUCTION
On April 21, 2015, Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action
alleging that Defendant John Spaulding (“Defendant”) defaulted on two promissory notes. Dkt. No.
1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiff previously requested a default judgment, which the Court denied due to
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rule 55.2. See Dkt. Nos. 8; 9. Presently before the Court
is Plaintiff’s Motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). Dkt.
No. 10 (“Motion”). For the following reasons, the Motion is granted.
II.
BACKGROUND
On October 16, 1984, Defendant executed a promissory note to secure a loan in the amount
of $2,500.00 from Key Bank of Central New York, located in Syracuse, New York. Dkt. No. 1-1
(“Exhibits”) at 1.1 On July 16, 1985, Defendant executed a second promissory note for a loan in the
amount of $2,500.00 with the New York State Higher Education Department. Id. at 2. The loans
were guaranteed by the New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, and then reinsured
1
Citations to the Exhibits correspond with the pagination assigned by the Court’s Electronic
Filing System.
by the United States Department of Education under authorized loan guaranty programs. Dkt. No.
1-2 (“Certificate of Indebtedness”). Defendant defaulted on the loans, and Plaintiff commenced the
present action. Compl. Defendant did not file a responsive pleading, and on May 29, 2015, the
Clerk filed an Entry of default against Defendant at Plaintiff’s request. Dkt. Nos. 6, 7. On June 3,
2015, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for default judgment, seeking an award of $5,595.28 in
unpaid principal and $6,349.39 in accrued interest as of April 15, 2015. Dkt. No. 10-2 at 2.
III.
LEGAL STANDARD
“Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 provides a two-step process that the Court must follow
before it may enter a default judgment against a defendant.” Elec. Creations Corp. v. Gigahertz,
Inc., No. 12-CV-1423, 2013 WL 3229125, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. June 25, 2013) (quoting Robertson v.
Doe, No. 05-CV-7046, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2008)). “First, under Rule
55(a), when a party fails to plead or otherwise defend . . . the clerk must enter the party’s default.”
Id. Second, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), “the party seeking default judgment is
required to present its application for entry of judgment to the court.” Id.
“When a default is entered, the defendant is deemed to have admitted all of the well-pleaded
factual allegations in the complaint pertaining to liability.” Bravado Int’l Grp. Merch. Servs., Inc. v.
Ninna, Inc., 655 F. Supp. 2d 177, 188 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (citing Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.
U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992)). “While a default judgment constitutes an
admission of liability, the quantum of damages remains to be established by proof unless the amount
is liquidated or susceptible of mathematical computation.” Flaks v. Koegel, 504 F.2d 702, 707 (2d
Cir. 1974); see also Bravado Int’l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. “[E]ven upon default, a court may not
rubber-stamp the non-defaulting party’s damages calculation, but rather must ensure that there is a
2
basis for the damages that are sought.” Robertson, 2008 WL 2519894, at *3. “The burden is on the
plaintiff to establish its entitlement to recovery.” Bravado Int’l, 655 F. Supp. 2d at 189. “While
‘the court must ensure that there is a basis for the damages specified in a default judgment, it may,
but need not, make the determination through a hearing.’” Id. at 190..
Under Local Rule 55.2(b), the moving party must submit with its motion for default
judgment: (1) a clerk’s certificate of entry of default; (2) a proposed form of default judgment; (3) a
copy of the pleading to which no response has been made; and (4) an affidavit. N.D.N.Y. L.R.
55.2(b). The affidavit must set forth that: (1) the party against whom judgment is sought is not an
infant, incompetent, or in military service; (2) the party against whom judgment is sought has
defaulted in appearance in the action; (3) service was properly effected under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4; (4) the amount sought is justly due and owing, and no part has been paid; and (5) the
disbursements sought to be taxed have been made in the action or will necessarily be made or
incurred. N.D.N.Y. L.R. 55.2(a).
IV.
DISCUSSION
In the present case, Plaintiff has met its burden of showing that it is entitled to a default
judgment. The Complaint and Exhibits attached thereto demonstrate that Defendant executed
promissory notes to obtain two student loans. The Department of Education has demanded payment
in accordance with the terms of the notes and to date, Defendant has failed to pay the debt. These
allegations, which are deemed admitted by Defendant’s failure to respond, are sufficient to establish
Defendant’s liability. See Cotton v. Slone, 4 F.3d 176, 181 (2d Cir. 1993).
V.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is hereby:
3
ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Motion (Dkt. No. 10) for default judgment is GRANTED; and
it is further
ORDERED, that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as follows: $5,595.28 in unpaid principal
and $6,719.62 in accrued interest, for a total award of $12,314.90; plus post-judgment interest
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Decision and Order on all
parties in accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
February 10, 2016
Albany, New York
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?