Pichel et al v. Everbank et al

Filing 79

ORDER: On March 23, 2016, this Court, noting that Plaintiff had not prosecuted this action diligently, ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed by April 22, 2016. See Dkt. No. 78 . That date has passed, and Plaintiff ha s not responded to the Court's order. The Court will therefore dismiss the case for want of prosecution. It is therefore ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(b) and Local Rule 41.2 for failure to prosecute. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/13/2016. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff Aaron Pichel via regular and certified mail.] (mc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_____________________________________
___
AARON PICHEL, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.

5:15-CV-487

EVERBANK, et al.
Defendants.
________________________________________

ORDER

Thomas J. McAvoy, Senior District Judge.
On March 23, 2016, this Court, noting that Plaintiff had not prosecuted this action
diligently, ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed by April
22, 2016. See dkt. # 78. That date has passed, and Plaintiff has not responded to the
Court’s order. The Court will therefore dismiss the case for want of prosecution. It is
therefore ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b) and Local Rule 41.2 for failure to prosecute.

Dated:May 13, 2016

1