Klapan et al v. Fremont Investment & Loan Corporation et al

Filing 28

ORDER - That the 26 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety. That this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute. That the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/6/2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ ZVONKO KLAPAN and CHRISTINE KLAPAN, Plaintiffs, 5:15-cv-1525 (GLS/TWD) v. FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN CORP. and GREENWICH INVESTORS XXVI, LLC, Defendants. ________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ZVONKO KLAPAN and CHRISTINE KLAPAN Plaintiffs, Pro Se 7191 Opal Drive Liverpool, New York 13088 FOR DEFENDANT GREENWICH INVESTORS XXVI, LCC: O’Connell & Aronowitz 54 State Street, 9th Floor Albany, New York 12207 FOR DEFENDANT FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN CORP. No Appearance F. MATTHEW JACKSON, ESQ. Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks, duly filed on June 1, 2017. (Dkt. No. 26.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 26) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close this case; and it is further ORDERED that the clerk provide a copy of this Order to plaintiffs by certified mail and to defendants in accordance with the Local Rules of Practice. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. July 6, 2017 Albany, New York 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?