Doe v. Colgate University et al
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff, John Doe, desires to voluntarily discontinue this proceeding. Therefore, Plaintiff and all Defendants, by their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 01/12/2017. (hmr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 5:16-cv-00072
(DNH/TWD)
v.
COLGATE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL
Defendants.
Plaintiff, John Doe, desires to voluntarily discontinue this proceeding. Therefore,
Plaintiff and all Defendants, by their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that this
action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs
and attorneys’ fees.
NESENOFF & MILTENBERG, LLP
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING PLLC
By: /s/ Tara J. Davis
Andrew Miltenberg, Esq.
Tara J. Davis, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff, John Doe
363 Seventh Avenue – 5th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Telephone: (212) 736-4500
Email: amiltenberg@nmllplaw.com
Email: tdavis@nmllplaw.com
By: /s/ Laura H. Harshbarger
Laura H. Harshbarger, Esq. (509779)
Kristen E. Smith, Esq. (512855)
Attorneys for Defendants Colgate
University, Jeffrey Herbst, Suzy M.
Nelson, Kimberly Taylor, Marilyn Rugg
and Valerie Brogan
One Lincoln Center
Syracuse, New York 13202
Telephone: (315) 218-8000
E-mail: lharshbarger@bsk.com
E-mail: ksmith@bsk.com
2824979.1
WARD, GREENBERG, HELLER &
REIDY, LLP
By: /s/ Thomas S. D’Antonio
Thomas S. D’Antonio, Esq.
Abigail L. Giarrusso, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Tamala Flack
1800 Bausch & Lomb Place
Rochester, New York 14604-2713
Telephone: (585) 454-0700
Email: tdantonio@wardgreenberg.com
Email: agiarrusso@wardgreenberg.com
SO ORDERED:
Hon. David N. Hurd
U.S. District Court Judge
January 12, 2017
2
2824979.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?