Davies v. Christopher Community et al
DECISION and ORDER: that the Court Adopts the Report, Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 8 ] for the reasons stated therein. It is hereby Ordered that plaintiff's complaint [dkt. # 1 ] is Dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff is granted leave to replead. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/13/2016. (hmr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------ROBERT M. DAVIES,
Civil Action No.
CHRISTOPHER COMMUNITY, et al.,
-------------------------------THOMAS J. McAVOY
Senior United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
This pro se employment action was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United
States Magistrate Judge, for initial review. In his September 9, 2016 Report,
Recommendation and Order, Magistrate Judge Peebles: (1) granted plaintiff’s In Forma
Pauperis application; (2) denied with leave to renew plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
counsel; and (3) recommended that all claims be dismissed, with leave to replead, because
the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted [dkt. # 8]. Plaintiff did not
file objections to the Report, Recommendation and Order, and the time to do so has expired.
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report,
Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 8] for
the reasons stated therein. Thus, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint [dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e). Plaintiff is granted leave to replead.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:October 13, 2016
The Court notes that on September 21, 2016, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Dkt. # 9. The
Court offers no opinion as to the sufficiency of the allegations made therein.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?