Garvey v. Childtime Learning Center
DECISION AND ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations and the Pltf's complaint is dismissed. As Pltf has already filed an Amended Complaint, the clerk is directed to deliver the 7 amended complaint to Magistrate Judge Baxter for an initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/17/16. [Served by mail.](sfp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SHAUN P. GARVEY,
CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTER,
Thomas J. McAvoy, SR. U.S.D.J.
DECISION and ORDER
The Court referred this employment-discrimination action, brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., to the Hon. Andrew T.
Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York.
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant discriminated against him in hiring because of his sexual
orientation and gender.
The Report-Recommendation, dated September 12, 2016, gave the Complaint,
filed in forma pauperis, a screening to determine whether Plaintiff has stated a plausible
claim pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). After reviewing the Complaint, Magistrate Judge
Baxter recommended that the Court dismiss the Complaint with leave to replead claims of
sex discrimination pursuant to Title VII.
Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report-Recommendation but instead filed an
Amended Complaint. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the
Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
The Report-Recommendation, dkt. # 5, is hereby ADOPTED, and the Plaintiff’s
Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. As Plaintiff has already filed an Amended Complaint,
the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to deliver the Amended Complaint, dkt. # 7, to Magistrate
Judge Baxter for an initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated:October 17, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?