Morse et al v. Alpine Access, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER adopting 60 Report and Recommendations and granting 46 Motion to Dismiss all claims of Plaintiff Sandy Morowitz. The claims of Plaintiff Sandy Morowitz under the Fair Labor Standards Act are DISMISSED with prejudice; claims of Sandy Moro witz as a named plaintiff under the New York Labor Law or other state law are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to her future participation, to the extent the Court deems appropriate, as an absent class member on those state law claims, if the Rule 23 class action becomes certified. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 11/8/17. (rjb, )

Download PDF
Case 5:17-cv-00235-BKS-ATB Document 62 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ______________________________________________________ CAROL MORSE, other similarly-situated individuals, et al., Plaintiffs, v. 5:17-CV-0235 (BKS/ATB) ALPINE ACCESS, INC., et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________ Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Carol Morse, Becky Nellos and Sandy Morowitz, commenced this Fair Labor Standards Act case asserting claims on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated individuals. Dkt. No. 1. On August 3, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Sandy Morowitz under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dkt. No. 46. Plaintiff Morowitz has not opposed this motion. Plaintiffs’ counsel has informed defense counsel that Morowitz intends to withdraw from the litigation. Dkt. No. 46-9, p. 1. Defendants’ motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter who, on September 26, 2017, issued a ReportRecommendation recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. Dkt. No. 60. Magistrate Judge Baxter advised the parties that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the report, and that the failure to object to the report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. Dkt. No. 60, p. 8. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Case 5:17-cv-00235-BKS-ATB Document 62 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2 As no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report-Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue, 2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 228-29 (N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts it in its entirety. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 60) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims of Plaintiff Sandy Morowitz (Dkt. No. 46) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Sandy Morowitz under the Fair Labor Standards Act are DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that claims of Sandy Morowitz as a named plaintiff under the New York Labor Law or other state law are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to her future participation, to the extent the Court deems appropriate, as an absent class member on those state law claims, if the Rule 23 class action becomes certified. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 8, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?