Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

CONSENT ORDER: REMANDING the # 1 Complaint - Social Security Appeal, and approving the # 12 Stipulation/Consent filed by the parties. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 4/9/2018. (jmb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x CINDY ROBINSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 5:17-CV-01170 (ATB) v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, CONSENT ORDER OF REMAND PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------x IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties in the above-titled action that this case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). AND, the Court having reviewed the record in this matter; IT IS on this ___ day of April 2018 9th SO ORDERED. HON. ANDREW T. BAXTER United States Magistrate Judge The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry of the within order. GRANT C. JAQUITH United States Attorney Northern District of New York BY: /s/ Padma Ghatage Padma Ghatage Special Assistant United States Attorney Bar Code No. 520461 c/o Social Security Administration 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 (212) 264-0981 Attorneys for Defendant BY: /s/ Karl E. Osterhout Karl E. Osterhout, Esq. Pennsylvania State Bar No.: 49658 Osterhout Berger Disability Law 521 Cedar Avenue, Suite 200 Oakmont, PA 15139 (412) 794-8003 Pro Hac Vice BY: /s/ Paul B. Eaglin Paul B. Eaglin, Esquire Bar Number: 519294 P.O. Box 6033 Syracuse, New York 13217 (877) 374-4744 Lead Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiff 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?