Rogers v. Pfizer et al
ORDER - That the 14 Order and Report-Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. That plaintiff's 13 amended complaint is DISMISSED. That the clerk close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/14/2021. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jel, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PFIZER et al.,
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
229 Duane Street
Syracuse, NY 13207
Gary L. Sharpe
Senior District Judge
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following an Order and
Report-Recommendation (R&R) by Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks,
duly filed June 9, 2021. (Dkt. No. 14.) Following fourteen days from the
service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections
filed by the parties herein.
Plaintiff pro se Megan Rogers filed a document in response to the R&R.
(Dkt. No. 15.) But that document, much like the amended complaint, is not
cogent, and it makes no specific objection to the R&R. The court has
reviewed the R&R for clear error, see Almonte v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole,
No. Civ. 904CV484, 2006 WL 149049, at *5-6 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2006), and
finds none. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14) is
ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 13) is
DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED that the clerk close this case; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to plaintiff in
accordance with the Local Rules of Practice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 14, 2021
Albany, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?