Rogers v. Pfizer et al

Filing 16

ORDER - That the 14 Order and Report-Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. That plaintiff's 13 amended complaint is DISMISSED. That the clerk close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/14/2021. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MEGAN ROGERS, Plaintiff, 5:21-cv-176 (GLS/TWD) v. PFIZER et al., Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Megan Rogers Pro Se 229 Duane Street Syracuse, NY 13207 Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following an Order and Report-Recommendation (R&R) by Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks, duly filed June 9, 2021. (Dkt. No. 14.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. Plaintiff pro se Megan Rogers filed a document in response to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 15.) But that document, much like the amended complaint, is not cogent, and it makes no specific objection to the R&R. The court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, see Almonte v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, No. Civ. 904CV484, 2006 WL 149049, at *5-6 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2006), and finds none. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 13) is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the clerk close this case; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules of Practice. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 14, 2021 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?