Beeman v. Saul
ORDER granting re 19 Stipulation filed by Kilolo Kijakazi IT IS on this 10th day of May, 2022; ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded fees and expenses in the amount of $6,750.00, and $402.00 in costs under EAJA, and that the fees are payable to the Plaintiff, but if Plaintiff does not owe a debt subject to offset, payable to Plaintiffs attorney. ORDERED that the within matter is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/10/2022. (khr)
Case 5:21-cv-00667-DNH-CFH Document 20 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case No. 5:21-cv-00667-DNH-CFH
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
Consent Order for Payment of Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the
parties in the above-titled action that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (28 U.S.C. § 2412) in the amount of six-thousand seven
hundred and fifty dollars ($6,750.00), and four hundred and two dollars ($402.00) in costs.
The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses
under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and not to his attorney and
can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586 (2010). After the Court enters this award, if Defendant can verify that Plaintiff owes
no preexisting debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to make the award payable to Plaintiff’s
attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel.
AND, the Court having reviewed the record in this matter;
IT IS on this 10th day of _____________ , 2022;
ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded fees and expenses in the amount of $6,750.00, and
$402.00 in costs under EAJA, and that the fees are payable to the Plaintiff, but if Plaintiff does not
owe a debt subject to offset, payable to Plaintiff’s attorney.
Case 5:21-cv-00667-DNH-CFH Document 20 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2
ORDERED that the within matter is dismissed with prejudice.
HON. DAVID N. HURD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry of the within order.
Dated: May 9, 2022
By Her Attorneys,
By Her Attorney,
Carla B. Freedman,
United States Attorney
/s/ Jessica Richards
Special Assistant United States Attorney
N.D.N.Y. Bar Roll No. 700996
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
J.F.K. Federal Building, Room 625
Boston, MA 02203
/s/ John W. DeHaan 1
John W. DeHaan. Esq.
The DeHaan Law Firm, P.C.
300 Rabro Drive East
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Signed by Attorney Jessica Richards with Attorney John W. DeHaan’s permission, provided
via e-mail on May 9, 2022.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?