Beasock v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER - That the 20 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines filed December 13, 2013 (Dkt. No. 20) is ACCEPTED in its entirety. That Beasock's request to remand this action is DENIED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/4/2014. (jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------BRENDA BEASOCK Plaintiff, -v.Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-1355 (GLS/ESH) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Office of Peter W. Antonowicz 148 West Dominick Street Rome, New York 13440 PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT: Social Security Administration Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 SIXTINA FERNANDEZ, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation by Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines, duly filed December 13, 2013. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines filed December 13, 2013 (Dkt. No. 20) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further ORDERED that Beasock’s request to remand this action is DENIED and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is to mail copies of the Order to the parties in accordance with the court’s local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2014 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?