Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
ORDER re 23 Report-Recommendation. The Report-Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 10/21/2014. (lah)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________
BONNIE L. ROSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
6:13-CV-00755
(NAM/TWD)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
N
Defendant.
_____________________________________________
APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
BONNIE L. ROSS
Plaintiff Pro Se
A
M
HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN
United States Attorney for the
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Northern District of New York
Room 218
James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse
Albany, New York 12207
and
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Social Security Administration Chief Counsel, Region II
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
Counsel for Defendant
ROBERT R. SCHRIVER, ESQ.
STEPHEN P. CONTE, ESQ.
NORMAN A. MORDUE, SENIOR U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge
Thérèse Wiley Dancks, duly filed on the 29th day of September 2014. Following fourteen (14)
days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed
by the parties herein.
After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge’s ReportRecommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.
2. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the plaintiff’s complaint is
N
dismissed.
3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the
Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2014
Syracuse, New York
A
M
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?