Race v. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER: Adopting the # 15 Report and Recommendation. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on April 13, 2015. (rep)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------DAWN RACE, Plaintiff, -v- 6:13-CV-1501 (DNH/TWD) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, as Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ Attorney for Plaintiff 148 West Dominick Street Rome, NY 13440 PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Social Security Administration Region II Attorney for Defendant 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 SERGEI ADEN, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Dawn Race filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated March 23, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. Defendant filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo determination of the portion of the Report-Recommendation to which defendant objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 13, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?