Race v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER: Adopting the # 15 Report and Recommendation. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on April 13, 2015. (rep)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------DAWN RACE,
Plaintiff,
-v-
6:13-CV-1501
(DNH/TWD)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, as Commissioner
Of Social Security,
Defendant.
-------------------------------APPEARANCES:
OF COUNSEL:
OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ
Attorney for Plaintiff
148 West Dominick Street
Rome, NY 13440
PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ.
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Social Security Administration
Region II
Attorney for Defendant
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3904
New York, NY 10278
SERGEI ADEN, ESQ.
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff Dawn Race filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for supplemental security income
under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated March 23, 2015, the
Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the
matter be remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
for further proceedings. Defendant filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation.
Based upon a de novo determination of the portion of the Report-Recommendation to
which defendant objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all
respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 13, 2015
Utica, New York.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?